Fairewinds Energy Education Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262920540
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8435017660
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Citizen Participation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,665
- Expenses
- $48,489
- Assets
- $2,485
- Liabilities
- $51,498
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Margaret Gundersen (President)
People named in this filing
- Chiho Kaneko (Director)
- Arnie Gundersen (Director)
- Robert Manning (Chairman)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fairewinds Energy Education shines a spotlight on the inequities and Environmental Justice Issues facing communities worldwide. Community-volunteer citizen-scientists and our scientific colleagues conduct research, analyze radioactively-contaminated areas, and present truthful data that is transparent and free to all. For example, did you know that nanoparticles and microparticles of radiation leak from uranium mines, nuclear fuel fabrication facilities, waste dumps, weapons sites, old test sites for atomic bombs and nuclear weapons, and operating atomic power reactors and contaminate communities worldwide? Moreover, in 2022, the world learned firsthand via the war in Ukraine that fragile nuclear power plants are as great a risk as nuclear weapons.
What it reported doing in 2022
During 2021 and 2022, Fairewinds Energy Education developed the Let's Measure It Program and laid thegroundwork to help contaminated communitiesstop the nuclear pollution of their schools, homes, and neighborhoods.Many communities host the world's oldest operating atomic power reactors, World War II bomb manufacturing plants, and nuclear waste dumps. Our research in this area is legacy work at Fairewinds Energy Education. During the last several years, the federal government has lessened many regulations restricting the movement of radioactivity.Most disturbingly, important federal regulators like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Department of Defense (DOD) have removed stringent government oversight on atomic power, nuclear waste, and nuclear industry and fuel manufacturing. These changes by our government make nuclear radioactivity appear innocuous and risk the health and safety of millions of children and families who live, work, or attend school near these toxic radioactive facilities.Did you know there is no technology available to clean up radiation released at nuclear and atomic sites? Radioactive microparticles of dust and dirt too small tosee migrate in the wind, weather patterns, wildfires, and the world's increasing climate catastrophes like hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods. Each community wework with faces tremendous Environmental Injustice Issues.Radioactivity-emanating from atomic power reactors, nuclear waste dumps, uranium mines, and nuclear fuel manufacturing facilities-is a rampant threat to communities throughout the United States and worldwide. And unfortunately, we never see, smell, or taste radiation when exposed. Instead, picture the soil we live on and everything around us-the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat-all contaminated without our knowledge. What genetic damage is this radiation doing to our children and families? What toxic damage is it doing to our blood and our organs? Now, imagine a world where we are part of the solution-individuals empowered by science to confront and expose the otherwise hidden threat of atomic radiation and exploitation in their communities as we gather and submit soil and dust samples from our backyards and public spaces. Things can quickly change when citizens are empowered by rapidly-evolving technological tools and web-based social connectivity! With this goal, Fairewinds Energy Education's Let's Measure It Program and its nuclear-site-specific projects make the data regarding the migration of radioactive materials completely available and public in an open, transparent, and democratized process. The solution to uncovering the movement of toxic radioactivity in communities is more accessible when we work together via community-based citizen-science to document the problem. Then, community-based data sleuths are community leaders, spokespeople, and stakeholders with legal standing in regulatory hearings and processes.Most of our projects serve historically marginalized communities. In the United States, Federal and State authorities have long singled out ethnic minority and indigenous communities to be unwitting hosts for atomic facilities, including nuclear bomb manufacturing factories, atomic reactor sites, and nuclear waste dumps. The federal and state governments are continually informing these communities that, in return, they will be the recipients of excellent jobs and growth in community resources and income. However, the government and corporations never informed these communities of the risks of ongoing radiation exposure.Additionally, here is what's essential: Nuclear Power Plants like Fukushima can explode during or after a meltdown and from a military attack. An atomic bomb explodes in the atmosphere, mainly releasing its radiation upwards into the jet stream, which spreads radiation globally. However, a nuclear power plantcontains 1,000 times more radiation than a bomb and occurs at g
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -88.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 20.72; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.