Fairbanks Men's Hockey Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920137920
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Fairbanks, AK, USA
Phone
9074577427
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Winter Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$60,396
Expenses
$49,599
Assets
$60,745
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM HAWRYLUK (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN SLATER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JASON HERSEY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM HAWRYLUK (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN SLATER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MIKE LADOUCEUR (REGISTRAR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the sport of adult hockey.

What it reported doing in 2023

To promote adult hockey in fairbanks, Alaska. To encourage the maintenance of hockey skills. To educate and train adults in the area who wish to participate in the sport. New members of the organization are educated by fellow team members on the rules of the game and on maintaining skating and puck handling skills.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.5%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.5% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.