Fairbanks 2014 Arctic Winter Games Host Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800710683
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Fairbanks, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9074562014
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fairs
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $73,690
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFF JACOBSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEFF JACOBSON (PRESIDENT)
- PERRY AHSOGEAK (VICE PRESIDE)
- BART LEBON (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The arctic winter games is a high profile circumpolar sport competition for northern/arctic athletes and multi-cultural exposition for the circumpolar world. It is the obligation of the fairbanks 2014 arctic winter games host society to stage the games in a manner that effectively promotes the awg mission of providing fair athletic competition, a global cultural exchange plus an opportunity for social interaction between people of various cultural backgrounds.
What it reported doing in 2016
To host and organize the arctic winter games, resulting in well-anticipated and cohesive events that reflect energy and international discovery. To host the games includes athletic competition, such as traditional arctic sports and dene games, as well as cultural components, such as visual arts, dance, ceremonies, and galas with participants from across the circumpolar region. To organize the games requires gathering financial support, collecting volunteers, and producing the material required to promote and facilitate games activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -145.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2015 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.