Fair Housing Rights Center in Southeastern Pennsylvania

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232691322
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2156250700
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$493,497
Expenses
$571,789
Assets
$179,601
Liabilities
$249,092

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGELA MCIVER (CEO)
  • MARY LOUISE CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT)
  • LUDO SCHEFFER PHD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANGELA MCIVER (CEO): $124,146 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's programs are designed to counsel and educate fair housing requirements and promote compliance with fair housing laws.

What it reported doing in 2024

The fair housing rights center in southeastern Pennsylvania (fhrc): how we are, what we do, & how we do it: the fair housing rights center in southeastern Pennsylvania (fhrc) is a nonprofit 501 (c) (3) organization that has been working to eliminate unlawful inequalities and inequities in housing since 1992. Fhrc educates the public about fair housing and lending, investigates housing-related activities, and takes enforcement actions to achieve its mission. In addition, fhrc is a broad-based, full-service, qualified fair housing enforcement organization. The staff provides investigative and enforcement services to individuals who have experienced housing discrimination in rental, sales, lending, insurance, and appraisals. Works with the government to increase the public's knowledge and awareness of fair housing policies. Audits the practices of real estate and related industries; advocates to sustain good or amend harmful housing policies. Fhrc contracts with housing providers to improve compliance with fair housing laws. Fhrc monitors the community for compliance with applicable housing laws and contracts with private businesses to conduct fair housing or fair lending investigations. Fhrc provides professional services to housing counselors. Lastly, fhrc provides information and referrals on housing-related issues and operates as a trauma-informed service provider. As the demand for fair housing grew in 2007, fhrc expanded its geographical reach to assist the public that relied on the organization for services. It is also why the organization changed its name from the fair housing council of montgomery county to the fair housing rights center in southeastern Pennsylvania, serving bucks, chester, Delaware, montgomery, and philadelphia counties. As sociopolitical conditions evolve, both impact access to housing and fair housing policies and practices. Therefore, to reach more underserved rural and suburban communities by 2020, fhrc increased its boundaries to rural and underserved residents in berks, bucks, chester, cumberland, dauphin, lancaster, lebanon, lehigh, montgomery, perry, philadelphia, schuylkill, and york counties. By expanding into new communities, fhrc helps 14 counties in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. During fy 2025, five employees worked to fulfill grants and contracts through a hybrid model consisting of on-site and remote activities. In fy 2025, the public contacted fhrc for diverse housing needs, including placement on housing waiting lists, searches for housing providers who would accept housing choice vouchers, domestic violence, habitability, increases in rental rates, code enforcement, evictions, lease terminations without penalties, requesting reasonable accommodations and modifications in housing, and environmental issues. Here are highlights of fhrc's fy 2025 social impact leading to increased housing equality and equity: (1) the intake department helped 261 family members by conducting 144 intakes, including 20 non-discrimination inquiries and 124 diverse allegations of housing discrimination.(2) the enforcement program processed 124 allegations of unlawful housing discrimination, referred 12 complaints to federal, state, and local administrative offices, negotiated six settlements addressing accessibility, source-of-income, and disability violations, and achieved 20 reasonable accommodations for the disabled population. (3) the testing program produced 190 test parts and conducted two zoning ordinances and four bank redlining investigations. (4)the education and outreach program educated 482 professionals and the public on fair housing and lending policies and practices. Thank you for allowing fhrc to work on your behalf.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 77.1%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $66.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.39; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.3% of revenue deployed · 77.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $441K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.