Fair Hill Community Physicians Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920829290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2673094629
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,396,871
- Expenses
- $13,180,620
- Assets
- $1,976,688
- Liabilities
- $12,455,964
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- David DeMilio (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- David DeMilio (CEO): $350,275 total reported compensation
- Arsala Ali (Controller): $230,247 total reported compensation
- Alex Bonilla (Director of Operations): $161,162 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule OThe mission of Fair Hill Community Physicians, Inc. is to provide the highest quality healthcare to underserved populations, partnering with patients and their families to address their needs through accessible and comprehensive healthcare services and education initiatives.
What it reported doing in 2024
With six physician clinics in the Philadelphia region, Fair Hill Community Physicians, Inc. offers a range of essential healthcare services to patients, from routine preventative care, to the management of chronic conditions. Our providers work with patients to address health areas of concern before they escalate, and they provide ongoing monitoring and personalized treatment plans to improve patients' quality of life. Our services include preventative medicine, immunizations, health screenings, and diagnosis and treatment of acute illness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 6
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -144.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 6.3; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 61.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 51.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -67.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $350K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1M reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.