Fair Elections Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815447067
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023310114
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,294,477
Expenses
$8,038,833
Assets
$5,195,890
Liabilities
$380,424

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT BRANDON (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • REBEKAH CARUTHERS (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT BRANDON (PRESIDENT & CEO): $296,554 total reported compensation
  • REBEKAH CARUTHERS (VICE PRESIDENT): $212,553 total reported compensation
  • MICHELLE KANTER-COHEN (SR COUNSEL): $149,922 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fair elections center (fec) is a national, nonpartisan voting rights and election reform organization dedicated to safeguarding the future of our democracy through innovative efforts focused on voting rights and civic engagement. The center works to improve election and civic engagement. The center works to improve election administration through legislative, legal, and administrative reform; to protect access to the ballot through litigation; and to provide election law expertise, voter information, and technical assistance to voter mobilization organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Campus vote project (cvp): cvp works with universities, community colleges, faculty, students, and election officials to reduce barriers to student voting. The program enables campus leadership to institutionalize reforms that empower students with information on how to register and vote. College students face special challenges when attempting to register and vote in their college communities. These students sometimes lack information about voter registration rules and deadlines, lack acceptable forms of id for voter registration or voting purposes, lack transportation to the polls, face confusion about where to vote, or even face unsympathetic election officials. In recent years, some state legislatures around the country pursued laws that seek to limit access to the polls with particularly damaging effects for student voters. Cvp seeks to address these challenges by providing school administrators current voting information that they can offer their students during events like orientation and class registration. Cvp also develops best practices for colleges to disseminate information to all enrolled students through campus-wide communications during voter registration, early voting, and on election day. In 2024, cvp marked its 12th year working nationwide to institutionalize access to voting for college students. Cvp partnered with about 340 campuses that enrolled more than 4 million students in 41 states and the district of columbia. The project ran staffed programs in ten states (az, fl, ga, mi, nc, oh, pa, tx, va, wi) and established between 20 and 35 formal partnerships with schools in each of these states. Cvp also pays stipends to student "democracy fellows" to work with campus administrators, faculty, and other student leaders to support non-partisan voter education efforts. Fec also provides them with leadership and election law training. In 2024, xxx fellows completed the program in the spring and 260 completed the program in the fall. Additionally, cvp furthered its hbcu legacy initiative, ain the fall. Additionally, cvp furthered its hbcu legacy initiative, a ain the fall. Additionally, cvp furthered its hbcu legacy initiative, a in program started in 2020 designed to specifically address barriers to student voting and encourage increased civic engagement on more than 45 historically black colleges and universities in cvp's 10 staffed states as well as in al, md, and la.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 72.4%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $28.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 15%; rating input score 15; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 72.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $297K · 18 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 15/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.