Facing Forward to End Homelessness
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363397005
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7732651207
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,838,449
- Expenses
- $7,385,398
- Assets
- $3,116,028
- Liabilities
- $694,776
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUGLAS BRADSHAW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- HARISH VENKITARAMANAN (PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINA LOPEZ (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS BRADSHAW (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $170,735 total reported compensation
- LASHONDA MILTON (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $128,047 total reported compensation
- MELISSA ANSON (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $109,520 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To end homelessness for families and individuals by offering home, help, and hope.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supportive services programs: sanctuary place, home connections, home connections ii, housing resource specialists (formerly skilled assessors), housing location, first foundationssanctuary place - clients in this program reside at sanctuary place, a 69-unit housing development in chicago's west humboldt park neighborhood. It offers 63 studio apartments for single residents, 6 townhomes for families, and access to on-site case management and supportive services. The organization provides long-term housing and supportive services which are designed to enhance the quality of life for the residents and empower them in moving toward progressively self-sufficient living. Support services include promoting residential stability, increasing household income, addressing healthcare needs, educational advancement, job readiness, and everything else identified as a root cause of homelessness or a barrier to advancement. Services are provided by the organization as well as through linkage agreements with other agencies.housing resource specialists (formerly skilled assessors): in partnership with local shelters, facing forward conducts one-time assessments focused on housing needs and vulnerability. Facing forward assisted 1,994 individuals in fiscal year 2025 from chicago's housing services wait list to connect them to critical resources including food, shelter, and medical care through referrals to service providers in the community.first foundations is a rapid-rehousing pilot program for families with expectant parents or children ages three and under who are facing or at risk of homelessness and helps them to secure stable, affordable housing for families and provides two years of rental assistance and comprehensive case management. Supportive services include employment assistance, age-specific support for children, parenting supports, and connections to childcare and family healthcare, we help families build stability and develop the skills necessary to move from the program into stable housing of their own. First foundations served 11 families (30 individuals) in fy25.innovative programs for families facing forward's two-generation pilot programs home connections i & ii take a transformative approach to ending homelessness by addressing the interconnected needs of parents and children. By housing families quickly and providing targeted support, families are empowered to break generational cycles of homelessness and create pathways to lasting stability and success. In partnership with chicago public schools and university of chicago urban labs, the home connection pilot program provides housing-focused case management, short-term financial assistance, and up to one year of rental assistance for families with students experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Our home connection program served 47 families (165 individuals) in fy25.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $171K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.