Facade Tectonics Institute
Legal name: Facade Tectonics Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821341190
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5629008720
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $206,651
- Expenses
- $195,196
- Assets
- $321,129
- Liabilities
- $96,351
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HELEN SANDERS (President)
- ATTILA ARIAN (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- HELEN SANDERS (President)
- MIC PATTERSON (Director)
- ATTILA ARIAN (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To accelerate transformative change in the built environment toward common goals of resilience and sustainability by leveraging the pervasive influence of the building skin.
What it reported doing in 2025
During 2025, the Facade Tectonics Institute (FTI) continued to advance its mission to promote innovation in the art, science, and technology of building facades, accelerating change in the performance of built environments. Through conferences, regional forums, educational programming, publications, research initiatives, and member engagement activities, FTI strengthened its role as a leading interdisciplinary platform connecting architects, engineers, fabricators, researchers, manufacturers, academics, and building industry professionals.Educational Programs & Regional Forums--------------------------------------On March 19, 2025, the FTI Los Angeles Hub hosted a Historic Preservation event at the McCarthy Building Companies' offices in Los Angeles. The educational program featured a panel of architects and faade design experts from the Los Angeles region discussing preservation, adaptive reuse, and faade performance. More than 30 members and non-members attended.On 21 May, 2025, FTIs Education Committee and Los Angeles Hub organized the FTI Forward: Student Forum on Facades Carbon 2025 at SCI-Arc. Students from SCI-Arc, UCLA, USC, Woodbury University, and Cal Poly participated in a half-day interdisciplinary dialogue exploring faades, carbon, circularity, and sustainable design. Approximately 50 students, faculty members, professionals, and community participants attended.On 15 July, 2025, the Los Angeles Hub organized the DTLA Facades Walk, an educational tour focused on Los Angeles historic and architecturally significant building stock. Participants explored notable faades and urban environments throughout Downtown Los Angeles, followed by networking and discussion at the McCarthy Building Companies offices. More than 30 people attended. On October 7, 2025, the Los Angeles Hub hosted a successful Annual LA-hub Expo and Fundraiser! - a fundraising and educational event at FHC offices in Los Angeles. The program included fabricator tours, product demonstrations, material displays, presentations on new faade technologies and innovations, and a panel discussion featuring architects and faade experts from the West Coast focused on the current state of building construction in the Greater Los Angeles region. More than 100 members and non-members attended the event.On October 10, 2025, FTI partnered with Thomas Jefferson Universitys College of Architecture and the Built Environment to host a half-day Facades Forum in Philadelphia. The program featured expert-led sessions moderated by Jefferson faculty members covering complex geometries in faade design, building envelopes and climate change, and innovative faade materials. Approximately 70 students, faculty members, architects, engineers, and industry professionals attended.Vitruvian Honors & Awards & New York Hub----------------------------------------On September 18, 2025, FTI successfully hosted the New York Hub Forum and the Vitruvian Honors & Awards at the Center for Architecture in New York City. The New York Forum featured presentations by leading faade experts, practitioners, and academics. The Vitruvian Honors & Awards program celebrated excellence and innovation in facade design, engineering, sustainability, research, and technology. The program received more than 150 submissions and welcomed approximately 110 attendees, including FTI members, industry professionals, academics, and guests.Industry Leadership & Conference Participation----------------------------------------------On October 6, 2025, FTI members delivered a curated session at the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) Conference in Toronto. The sessions focused on overcoming challenges in faade design and delivery, policy development, and the future of high-performance facades. The presentation also summarized the results of a year-long research study conducted by FTI for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), examining barriers to adoption of high-performance faades and fenestration systems i
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.9%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.01 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 65.9% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.