Eye Care Bequia Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883154203
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Fishkill, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8388500242
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $508
- Assets
- $43
- Liabilities
- $3,481
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Denis E White (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Denis E White (CEO)
- Pat-Michael Palmiero MD (Director)
- Betty A White (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Eye Care Bequia, LTD will bring comprehensive and continuing eye care services to the people who live on the island of Bequia in St. Vincent & the Grenadines.
What it reported doing in 2025
As is common to populations that inhabit areas near the Equator, a significant number of Bequians suffer from various eye conditions from long-term exposure to the sun that can lead to impairment of vision or blindness. There are no ophthalmologists offering consistent eye care services on the island. Limited eye care is only available on the island on St. Vincents, which can be difficult to access and travel there takes time from work or school. Moreover, if surgery or other complex services are required, the cost of those services interferes with receiving care.Our board-certified ophthalmologist and experienced support team volunteer their time, skills, and knowledge for crucial screening, diagnostic, medical, surgical, and preventive eye care services to meet the critical needs for the Bequia population.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 80.95; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.