Extrusion Technology for Aluminum Profiles Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364467869
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Libertyville, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8475262010
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Engineering and Technology
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100
- Expenses
- $15
- Assets
- $15,137
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jason Weber (President/Sec)
People named in this filing
- Mark Butterfield (Chairman)
- Brook Hamilton (Immd Past Chair)
- Jason Weber (President/Sec)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to providing superior educational programming and opportunities to promote the global exchange of new and improved technologies in aluminum extrusion.statement of program service accomplishmentsas of january 1, 2013, the foundation suspended its operations andlicensed its affiliate organization, aluminum extruders council, tocarry out programs formerly administered by the foundation. Theseprograms included the et design competition and et seminar, which hadbeen historically held once every four years by the foundation. Theterm of the license is indefinite. The manner in which the foundationwill continue to accomplish its primary purpose will be determined infuture periods.
What it reported doing in 2025
The foundation did not engage in any program activities during the current year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 85%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1,009.13; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 36.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.