Expressions of Joy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260706053
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Deerfield Beach, FL, USA
Phone
9543043278
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,062
Expenses
$17,561
Assets
$10,111
Liabilities
$168

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TOM WALKER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TOM WALKER (PRESIDENT)
  • JOSIANE GEYER (CREATIVE DIR)
  • DENNA MCDANIEL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote excellence and integrity in the arts.

What it reported doing in 2015

Eoj productions produced christmas near the beach, our annual holiday outreach for the ninth year. The christmas 2015 event drew an estimated attendance of 7,000 aided by support from local radio stations both christian and secular. Choirs, bands, and performers from dozens of local churches as well as recording artists and two ballet companies brought the christmas story to the public square in a powerful and engaging way. The city of hollywood and local community organizations provided extraordinary support with the chamber of commerce and cra pledging support for 2016.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 29.3%; rating input score 29

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -74.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 29.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.