Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter One

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300465117
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Jurupa Valley, CA, USA
Phone
9518475474
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Service Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,593
Expenses
$43,001
Assets
$130,760
Liabilities
$2,547

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicholas Nemirsky (President)
  • Kimberly Owen (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Nicholas Nemirsky (President)
  • Kimberly Owen (Vice President)
  • Travis Espinoza (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The chapter's primary program service is to provide scholarships to young adults interested in recreational and potential careers in aviation.

What it reported doing in 2025

Check 4068 4,561.00 Check #4069 for Flight Training Travis Espinoza 1,014.00 Check 4074 - Final payment Travis Espinoza 339 Check 4076 for Cristian's flight (paying Ralph) 1,500.00 Check 4076 for Cristian's flight (paying Ralph) 1,500.00 Cleanup Adjustment 3,147.00 Cleanup Adjustment 6,147.00 Check 4079 for Leila's scholarship 2,400.00 For Leila's scholarship 2,400.00 Check 4081 for Cristian's scholarship 1,500.00 For Cristian's scholarship 1,500.00 Cristian Scholarship 592 Check 4091 Leila 2,000.00 Check 4097 Cristian 1,250.00 Check 4098- Leila last and final payment 400 Leila 2,000.00 Scholarship Expense 1,250.00 Check 4098- Leila last and final payment 400 Leila scholar 2,400.00

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.04; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -24.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.