Experience Sioux Falls

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873484216
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Phone
6052756060
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,907,843
Expenses
$3,581,266
Assets
$5,831,812
Liabilities
$735,546

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TERI SCHMIDT (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • TERI SCHMIDT (CEO): $191,039 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Experience sioux falls works with strategic partners to market sioux falls, South Dakota, develop tourism, and strengthen events providing positive economic impact to the sioux falls community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Experience sioux falls, formerly the sioux falls convention and visitors bureau, is funded by two sources. When the organization was created in the early 70's, the city agreed to fund the group through a 1% room tax plus 500,000 from the general fund. This room rax was collected from all sioux falls hotels and directed to the organization. In 2011, a bid (business improvement district) was formed by sioux falls hotels, in cooperation with the city of sioux falls, to further fund experience sioux falls for the purpose of remaining competitive in sales and marketing. The bid became effective on january 1, 2011, via city ordinance and is collected from all hotels with 40+ rooms in the city limits of sioux falls. It was at this time that the 500,000 was no longer provided to experience sioux falls. Experience sioux falls (esf) - formerly known as convention & visitors bureau (cvb), exists to bring visitors to sioux falls to create economic impact throughout the city, i.e.: hotel room tax, sales tax, and jobs. In 2024, esf booked 111 conventions, meetings, and events involving 55,633 people. Esf distributed 76,489 visitor guides via mail, direct mail, reader response, downloads, and online views to leisure travelers across the united states, as well as distributed locally to approximately 200 locations in sioux falls. In 2024, the total number of visitors to sioux falls estimated by esf is 1,117,647. Esf serviced 56 conventions, meetings and events involving 187,767 people. Esf prints publications such as sioux falls visitor guide (130,000). Esf travels nationwide making sales calls and bid presentations to bring new business to the city. Digital and print sales and marketing programs are completed to advertise the city throughout the country. The visitor information center at falls park is also managed by esf.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -14.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $295K reported
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.