Exomedicine Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452998769
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Lexington, KY, USA
Phone
8592333502
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and/or Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$693
Assets
$749
Liabilities
$144,157

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • FT SAMUEL JR (DIRECTOR)
  • MARK KRISTY (DIRECTOR)
  • SUSAN WEISS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To advance the study of exomedicine through scientific research and development; educate members of the general public about exomedicine; support the scientific, educational, and charitable mission of the Kentucky science and technology corporation (a section 501(c)(3) organization); and aid other persons or organizations of any kind, whose mission and activities are consistent with the organization's own.

What it reported doing in 2022

Exomedicine institute is a nonprofit r&d enterprise focused on the development and application of new knowledge, technologies, and possibilities that emerge from a deeper understanding of the influences of microgravity on the dynamics of living systems, and the rigorous application of these insights to advance medical solutions. Using contemporary best practices, innovative multidisciplinary research, and discovery tools to go beyond current limitations and assumptions, the institute seeks to harness the unique environment of space and microgravity in the design of novel and transformational strategies for the improvement of everyday life for all people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 192.47; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.