Exodus Farms Ministry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463268460
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Anderson, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5309537178
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,018
- Expenses
- $165,602
- Assets
- $130,333
- Liabilities
- $28,832
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ginger Salido (President)
People named in this filing
- Ginger Salido (President)
- Barbara Cox (Treasurer)
- Brock Bernstein (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We minister to children who are broken as a direct result of mental, physical or sexual abuse and/or neglect. We also minister to children who are victims of substance addiction within their families. Our desire is to introduce these children to the love, healing and restoration that only Jesus Christ offers by working, riding and repurposing the broken horses that God has brought to our farm.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ran 9 one hour sessions per week with approximately 140 children and 16 rescued horses, 1 donkey, 4 mini horses and a mini mule. We have approximately 90 active volunteers. Children's lives are being changed as they learn to ride and care for the horses. The children have gained confidence, self-esteem, learned a work ethic and thrived in an unconditional love environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.