Exchange Club Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse of Oklahoma Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731284538
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4052322500
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,670,754
- Expenses
- $1,725,546
- Assets
- $1,240,530
- Liabilities
- $524,552
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINA SIEMENS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MICHELLE EDSTROM (PRESIDENT)
- JIMMIE KAY WETMORE RN (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- MELANIE WILSON RUGHANI (IMM. PAST PRESIDENT / TREASURER)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRISTINA SIEMENS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $111,848 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to prevent child neglect and abuse by providing evidence-based parent education and support. Parent promise primarily serves at-risk, low-income families in Oklahoma county and the surrounding metropolitan area as well as promoting the importance of healthy families across the state of Oklahoma.
What it reported doing in 2024
Family resource center: parent promise provides an extensive library on parenting and child development of literature, dvds and a referral service to community resources for all parents. This library is open to the public. For families that participate in our home-based parent education and support programs, we offer assistance with expenses such as utility and rent on an as needed basis. Other items provided to families are (but are not limited to): diapers, wipes, baby/toddler safety items and educational toys. Private funding allows for parent promise to further aid parents in purchasing school uniforms, paying for ged tests and passes to enrichment activities such as trips to the zoo or science museum. The family resource center also stocks books so parent educators may take an age-appropriate book to each home visit. This encourages a love of reading in young children and helps lower income families build a home library. The family resource center helps incentivize parents to stay in the program, attend group parenting activities and meet their personal goals. All efforts to help them improve parenting skills, reduce household stress and become more self-sufficient so they may provide a safe and loving home environment where their children can grow into healthy and productive adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 85.5%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 85.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.