Excelsior Wellness
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911189908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5095593107
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Residential Mental Health Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,253,335
- Expenses
- $20,865,956
- Assets
- $28,415,539
- Liabilities
- $5,529,746
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrew Hill (President, Chief Executive Officer)
Highest reported compensation
- Tara-Willow James (Chief Medical Officer): $346,727 total reported compensation
- Andrew Hill (President, Chief Executive Officer): $300,115 total reported compensation
- Stacey Herron (Chief Operations Officer): $246,575 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Excelsior Wellness aligns people, institutions, and resources to restore and preserve our community's mental, emotional and physical health, and well-being.
What it reported doing in 2024
Excelsior Family Medicine: Successfully implemented the Collaborative Care Model within Primary Care by embedding a Licensed Social Worker, Registered Nurse and Community Health Worker into the clinic. A data registry supporting the model was organized and tracked through an Excel spreadsheet, with hopes that in the future an EHR compatible module could be purchased. This care model served approximately 85 patients whose depression and anxiety screeners showed improvement of over 3 points. In August we completed all milestones for the Behavioral Health Integration grant.(Continued on Schedule O)The key activities performed under the Federal Promoting Integration of Primary Care and Behavioral Health (PIPBHC) grant included education for providers and staff in adoption of integrated care models, expansion/refinement planning for integration to include all service lines, and increased patient support through portal messaging and simplified telehealth connectivity.To further our efforts in integrated health, the Epic electronic health record was launched in August for psychiatric services. The purchase and implementation of the system brings more transparency to providers across disciplines, improves patient communications, allows for more accurate patient data exchange, and gives increased visibility to medical and behavioral health services being sought externally.We met a major goal by bringing primary care to the Excelsior main campus. The move increases access to preventative care medical services for Excelsior's broader clientele and to the Indian Trail neighborhood as a whole. The renovated north wing of the building highlights our model of physical and mental wellness care integration. In 2024, providers across our service disciplines completed 10,409 visits. Primary care welcomed 864 new patients into services. We narrowed the focus of outpatient mental health counseling to only serve internal referrals due to the volume of people seeking care and performed 1,407 sessions. In early 2024, we had turnover of all providers in the psychiatric service line and backfilled two of the vacancies with newly graduated PMHNPs. This resulted in less than 300 completed services and this low number is a direct reflection of the scarcity of psychiatric resources in our region.We hired 1.6 additional providers including a part time primary care nurse practitioner and an LMHC Clinical Programs Manager. Support staff numbers remained stable though we experienced typical turnover rates in front desk staff and medical assistants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 79% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.5%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.5% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $15.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $347K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.