Excellent Covenant Christian Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742962589
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Killeen, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2546808277
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $388,738
- Expenses
- $288,538
- Assets
- $203,791
- Liabilities
- $6,906
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELVIN NERO (PRESIDENT)
- SABRINA NERO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CONNIE BRICE (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $31,870 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission statement is to provide a christ-centered, academically sound education, while commissioning students to be future leaders who excel in their individual pursuits as directed by god.
What it reported doing in 2022
Non-denominational bible based education to children ages 4 years to 6th grade.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some related-organization disclosures are missing.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.1%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.1% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $269K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $32K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.