Ewing Sarcoma Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331254732
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2146672210
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cancer Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,334
- Expenses
- $33,924
- Assets
- $16,410
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR PATRICK GROHAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DR HEINRICH KOVAR (EUROPEAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DR PATRICK GROHAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DR HEINRICH KOVAR (EUROPEAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CHAD A BROWN (SECRETARY, TREASURER, BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Accelerate scientific discovery & development of breakthrough treatments for ewing sarcoma patients.
What it reported doing in 2024
Strategic advisory board - a defining accomplishment of the institute's founding year was the identification, recruitment, and formal seating of its strategic advisory board, comprised of twelve of the world's leading experts in ewing sarcoma. Institute leadership mapped the global landscape of scientific and clinical expertise in the disease and engaged top researchers and clinicians across leading institutions. The resulting board represents the foremost authorities on ewing sarcoma biology, translational research, and clinical care, providing the institute with unparalleled scientific guidance on this rare disease. Establishing the strategic advisory board in the first year provided the scientific credibility and expert oversight needed to guide research investments and programmatic priorities from the outset.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.6%; rating input score 43
- Program expense ratio: 62.7%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.6%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.6% of revenue deployed · 62.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.