Evolve Pink Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
851440226
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Flemington, NJ, USA
Phone
2017270707
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Breast Cancer

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,601
Expenses
$40,801
Assets
$62,407
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jennifer Montes (President / Medical Director)
  • Zuhaib Ibrahim (Vice President / Medical Director)

People named in this filing

  • Jennifer Montes (President / Medical Director)
  • Zuhaib Ibrahim (Vice President / Medical Director)
  • Ellen Rich (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of Evolve Pink is to give women the necessary tools to take what is likely the most catastrophic event in their life and transform it into their catalyst for empowerment, self- love and greatness. Evolve Pink is relevant to all women affected by breast cancer and their loved ones no matter where they are on their journey to help them feel whole, beautiful, and healthy in mind, body and spirit. Evolve Pink brings women with breastcancer on a positive pathway to wellness through education, holistic programs, compassionate support services, and by creating a unique and diverse network of survivors, mentors and friends to inspire true waysof living a positive, joyful and empowered life.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide support to individuals affected by breast cancer, including educational programs and group activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 29
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.2%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 40.2%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.2% of revenue deployed · 40.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.