Evolution Volleyball Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463028993
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Torrance, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3108715997
- Rating
- 33
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $148,437
- Expenses
- $163,433
- Assets
- $2,786
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Duncan Scott Avery (President)
People named in this filing
- Duncan Scott Avery (President)
- Kiana Denise Brede (Secretary)
- Matthew John Prosser (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We strive to provide a valuable opportunity for the youth of the South Bay to participate in organized indoor volleyball run by knowledgable coaches with years of experience teaching the game. Not only do we expect for every athlete in our program to evolve into an improved player, the club's ultimate goal is to instill sportsmanship, positive attitudes and competitive greatness that are learned from playing a team sport.
What it reported doing in 2017
Organization creates a valuable and competitive club experience at the most reasonable cost. Even at discounted rates, we do not sacrifice the quality of coaching and the training experience athletes will receive.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.5%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -145.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.