Everybody Wins Los Angeles

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

14 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

See schedule o, pages 1 and 2, for a description of organization's primary mission.

We served 178 children for the year ending september 30, 2011.

Revenue model: Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Operating margin: 17.2%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 55.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 89.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $103K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.