Everybody Plays Foundationinc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455250804
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- New Haven, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2036545078
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community Recreational Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $28,068
- Assets
- $779
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM L DIXON (PRESIDENT)
- QUEEN L SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT-TREASURER)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM L DIXON (PRESIDENT)
- QUEEN L SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The everybody plays foundation is a fully recognized 501-c-3 non-profit based in new haven, ct. The foundation's goal is to increase sport and cycling participation throughout the state, but especially in Connecticut's urban communities. The centric sports and cycling center will be the home of everybody plays foundation. The centric sports and cycling center will offer participation opportunities from basic to advanced in basketball, track and field, volleyball and cycling, as well as other sports. Summer camps, after school programs, and advanced skills, will be available. The foundation's goals are to create a path for the highly skilled and motivated athlete to advance while also allowing children and adults to enjoy sports in a safe environment at their own pace. Everybody plays foundation will offer scholarships to people of need for all cscc has to offer.
What it reported doing in 2018
Developing the plans for the centric sports & cycling center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 67.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -105.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -72.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.