Every Eligible American

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863619093
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2025446960
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Voter Education, Registration

Reported finances

Revenue
$175,901
Expenses
$301,325
Assets
$344
Liabilities
$1,944,884

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TRAVIS BRIMM (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT-PARTIAL YEAR)
  • ANDREW GODINICH (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT, TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • TRAVIS BRIMM (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT-PARTIAL YEAR)
  • ANDREW GODINICH (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT, TREASURER)
  • SARAH ANDREWS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations primary mission is to support policies that strengthen participation in democracy, educate the public on the crucial role of secretaries of state in protecting voting rights, and shine a light on those working to roll back election access.

What it reported doing in 2024

Programs supported policies that strengthen participation in democracy among communities that have been underrepresentedin the democratic process, educated the public on the crucial role secretaries of state play in protecting voting rights, shined a light on bad actors working to roll back election access and encouraged people to vote.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 4
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.7%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 40.1%; rating input score 40

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -71.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 5,653.73; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -70.7% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -112.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.7% of revenue deployed · 40.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $121K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.