Evergreen Dist Assoc of Chapters Spebsqsa C/o Larry Breitbarth

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911151879
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
Phone
2064658156
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$214,581
Expenses
$241,816
Assets
$852,491
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BILL HICKMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • SID BROWN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BOB COX (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BILL HICKMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • SID BROWN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LARRY BREITBARTH (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Evergreen's mission is to perpetuate the old american institution: the barbershop quartet and barbershop harmony, promote appreciation of barbershop harmony, initiate and maintain a broad program of musical education, contests, and apprecation in support of barbershop harmony and the allied arts, establish and maintain foundations that support our vision, and initiate, promote and participate in charitable projects that supoort our vision.

What it reported doing in 2025

Preserving an american art formharmony college northwest -- this is an entire weekend of barbershopeducation. The weekend has been certified as acceptible continuingeducation for Washington music teachers. The classes include vocaltraining, coaching training, director training, presentation, andarranging in the barbershop style. Attendance is approximately 400students. Those individuals return to their individual chapters andschools carrying the things they learned and passing the information onto others.performance funding -- provide financial support for musical groups carrying the barbershop musical style to other parts of the country and the world. This enables these groups to compete at higher levels. They return to evergreen district and disseminate what they learned through performing and coaching.officer travel--sending district officers to local chapters to provide both musical and administrative training, counseling, and other assistance as needed.this includes sending officers to support each chapter which sponsors a convention during the year. Providing support for chapters in remote areas is critical.regional leadership academies--weekend classes to educate local chapter officers in understanding their responsibilities as well as maximizing the opportunities to teach barbershop style music and barbershop quartetting. Multiple classes are held to minimize the amount of travel to attend an academy.contest & judging--pay for educating current judges maintaining their skills in interpreting the music, sound and stage presence demonstrating the barbershop a capella style. Certified judges provide training sessions at conventions to both choruses and quartets. Encourage members to join the judging community and become certified. Our contest and judging officer travels to each convention to assure all rules are followed.standing ovation--provide review of show and performances. The reviewer will comment on quality of performance and maintaining the educational purpose of the barbershop harmony society.communications--provide a website where members and the public can find information about the barbershop harmony musical style. The website can be used to contact others, find coaches, and to market our unique music, etc. Provide electronic publications which are available to all and offer more detailed information about educational events and activities both past and future. The timbre is published quarterly.webcast--provide opportunities to view conventions and similar performances in the barbershop harmony style.convention management--check potential sites for conventions and verify they have the right facilities to best produce the unamplified sound of our four-part harmony. Verify that the sites have areas for the judges to do their evaluation and education sessions. This may not happen every year. Only facilities which are not known or have not been used in the last few years are evaluated.qcedpreserving the barbershop quartet-quartet champions of evergreen district prepare and present shows and festivals educating those in attendance by demonstrating and teaching quality quartet singing. Provide education & travel expenses for quartets. Provide education for choruses. This encourages the continuation of barbershop singing and preserves this uniquely american musical art form.blmfthe bud leabo memorial fundthe bud leabo memorial fund (blmf) was established as a working memorial to the precepts and philosophy of bud leabo. He firmly believed in the value of music education and the impact of barbershop on all aspects of life. His belief was that more fun and satisfaction are possible by means of a heightened barbershop experience.the blmf was formed with the "culture of giving" in mind. We are here with the express mission to foster such a culture. Those who want to participate can do so in two ways. First, we are looking for projects that share the joy of barbershop with new people. We are looking forpeople with vision

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 54
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 5.9%; rating input score 6; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $227K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 22 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 6/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.