Everett Transitional Care Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 943264605
IRS 990 coverage: 2010–2024
Forms available: Form 990 2024
Location: Mill Creek, WA, USA
Phone: 4253324455
Rating: 72
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue: $9,664,085
Expenses: $9,664,085
Assets: $4,883,798
Liabilities: $3,871,067

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

JOSEPH SCRIVENS (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

SCOTT COMBS (TREASURER): $422,787 total reported compensation
JOSEPH SCRIVENS (CEO): $377,158 total reported compensation
JASON PETERSON (CHAIR): $246,891 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As people of providence and bethany of the northwest, we reveal god's love for all, especially the poor and vulnerable, through our compassionate healthcare services for patients in transitional care. We are dedicated to enhancing the quality and dignity of life of those we serve out of love to god and neighbor.

What it reported doing in 2024

Everett transitional care services (etcs) provides sub-acute care services to elderly and infirm individuals needing a moderate level of nursing care but not requiring hospital provided acute care. If an individual is recovering from an illness, injury, or surgery and needs short-term care after being released from the hospital, etcs provides an "in-between" place to heal through carefully planned rehabilitation. Etcs is a joint venture of bethany of the northwest and providence health system. This partnership brings together two long-standing organizations with similar missions - providing compassionate healing and service to those in need. An average length of stay is about 119.6 days serving 176 people during 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model: Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 75
Transparency & Controls: 71
Accountability: 72
Sustainability: 32
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 84.2%; rating input score 84
Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 84.2% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.1M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $423K · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $283K reported
Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.