Evel Knievel Days Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811013152
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Butte, MT, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $172,429
- Expenses
- $145,578
- Assets
- $20,879
- Liabilities
- $43,980
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN COE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN COE (PRESIDENT)
- MARY GALLICANO (VICE PRESIDE)
- KELLIE SAWYER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to organize, plan, promote and conduct evel knievel days in butte, Montana, as a free, family-friendly event to showcase motorcycle events, extreme sports and courageous acts and in celebration of evel knievel's life and passion in the promotion of motorcycle daredevil events and the safe and proper operation of motorcycles
What it reported doing in 2017
In 2017, evel knievel days inc. Successfully accomplished organizing, planning, promoting and conducting evel knievel days in butte, Montana as a free, family friendly event to showcase motorcycle events, extreme sports and courageous acts and celebrated evel knievel's life and passion in the promotion of motorcycle daredevil events and the safe and proper operation of motorcycles
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 90
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.11; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 48.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 144.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.9% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $145K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.