Eva's Eden
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912125288
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Columbia, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9313880517
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $76,429
- Expenses
- $52,244
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LANDON RUTHVEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROCHELLE MADRID (DIRECTOR)
- BLAIN TRENARY (DIRECTOR)
- JIM WEATHERBY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Evas edens mission is to provide hope, love, and a second chance to unwanted, homeless, feral or abandoned cats and kittens in our community. Through loving foster homes, we rehabilitate and provide a safe haven for felines in need of emotional and physical healing from some of the worst situations of dire need. In collaboration with local animal control and in support of our community, we provide homes, medical attention, spay and neuter, and loving support to those who need us. We are a no-kill, 501(c)3, shelter and sanctuary bringing love to the world, one cat at a time.
What it reported doing in 2023
To provide cat rescues within the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.3%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.6%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.3% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.