Euro Football Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
200140313
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Rochester, MN, USA
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Soccer

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,369
Expenses
$36,865
Assets
$107,589

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOE KARAU (President)
  • MAGGIE PERRY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JOE KARAU (President)
  • MAGGIE PERRY (Vice President)
  • CHRIS PRICE (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Euro football is a youth soccer club providing professional coaching to teach soccer in a consistent manner for true development from season to season. Their mission is to provide the maximum benefit of professional training through a program that emphasizes fun, sportsmanship, individual development and team play. The euro approach allows players the chance to excel for the enjoyment of the game and the challenge of the competition.

What it reported doing in 2019

The organization and its partners provide soccer training for area youth. Through a combination of volunteer and professional coaches, the organization has programs catered to youth ages 4 to 18 and for interest levels from recreational to competitive. The programs are divided into three seasons: fall, winter and summer. The fall programs serve over 1,000 players in total, several hundred players participate in winter programs, and the summer program serves nearly 2,000 players.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -293.5%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.