Eureka Womans Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941497354
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Eureka, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7074423458
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $153,394
- Expenses
- $80,707
- Assets
- $331,048
- Liabilities
- $250
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cyndi Bainbridge (President)
- Amanda Kunze (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Cyndi Bainbridge (President)
- Noelle Marak (Cores Sec)
- Amanda Kunze (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Working toward the betterment of our community through cultural, educational and social programs.
What it reported doing in 2025
Local Art Programs including, Humboldt Arts Council, Music Festivals, EHS-mixed-ensemble Eureka High School Music Department, Chorales, Community Concerts, Redwood Music Festivals, Youth Music Programs, Humboldt Light Opera Co.Educational Activities - College of the Redwoods Foundation League, Eureka City Schools, Friends of the Redwood Libraries, Literacy Programs.Health Programs --Braille Society, Cancer Society, Easter Seals, Public Health Programs, Evergreen Lodge, Hospice, Hospitals, Red Cross, Mobile Medical Office.Home Life/Seniors--AARP, Brown Bag and Food Eureka Woman's Club Annual Waffle BreakfastDelivery, Canine Companions, Meals on Wheels, Retirement Homes, Rehabilitation Centers, RSVP Senior Center activities, Senior Helpers, Senior Lunches, Telephone Pioneers, HSRC Alzheimer Center.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.3%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 57.5%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.1; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.3% of revenue deployed · 57.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.