Etz Hchayim

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453052523
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5129834132
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$198,404
Expenses
$194,395
Assets
$30,954
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Sarah J Avraham (Director)
  • Karen Stewart (Board Member)
  • Yisrael Avraham (Officer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community education center.

What it reported doing in 2024

Global Humanitarian Impact aid for countries Native America, USA, Indonesia, Pakistan, Malaysia Continued Indonesia furthering the vision of establishing a place for welfare and protection by implementing educational programs/services to protect children from the predatory system. Continued financial support to Ateret Yerushalayim Yeshiva in Israel as a mission to cover living expenses for 300 students. Asian Intensive: Makassar Indonesia - Sinar Bible College Israel Charity - Continued support for effects of October 7th Hamas attack. Italy - Prayer and Harvest Assignment Sent aid to Pakistan Partners: Flooding, Natural Disaster In addition: Bereavement Assistance for Etz H' Chayim International Families Virtual Teaching: Weekly to several nations - USA, Indonesia, India, Hong Kong, Singapore

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.5%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 73%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 28.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.5% of revenue deployed · 73% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $142K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.