Ethical Ai Governance Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881193090
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Menlo Park, CA, USA
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Continuing Education

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,000
Expenses
$50,102
Assets
$76,720

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Anik Bose (President)

People named in this filing

  • Aashay Tutika (Treasurer)
  • Emmanuel Benhamou (Secretary)
  • Anik Bose (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Ethical AI Governance Group was formed by a group of leading venture capital investors enterprise executives and startup entrepreneurs. We understand the risks AI systems can pose to privacy accountability and transparency and are committed to ensuring the responsible capitalization development and deployment of these technologies. We aim not only to catalyze innovation within the AI sector but also to ensure that ethical principles societal needs and a commitment to the betterment of humanity guide the development and deployment of AI technologies.

What it reported doing in 2025

Developed with insights from the Human AI Advisory Council and the EAIGG ecosystem the AI-Native Startup Playbook distills the most important frameworks for building and scaling AI-driven companies and deploying AI inside enterprises. The Playbook covers core dimensions of the AI economy including data challenges AI-native business models scaling strategies go-to-market execution and responsible AI governance. Drawing on lessons from AI-native startups and enterprise deployments it provides leaders with practical guidance for navigating the rapidly evolving AI landscape. As a cornerstone of EAIGGs work the Playbook establishes the shared vocabulary and strategic frameworks that inform our workshops events and collaborations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 32
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 73
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.5%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 51.1%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 59.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.5% of revenue deployed · 51.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.