Estate Managers Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461698172
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8187138100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $91,046
- Expenses
- $121,797
- Assets
- $90,508
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT BRYAN PEELE (President)
- JEREMY SCHIESTEL (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT BRYAN PEELE (President)
- GARY GRAY (Director)
- JOE CANE (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Emc is an associate of estate managers and corporate members seeking to promote higher professional standards, develop improved business models, enhance business conditions, encourage cooperation amongst estate managers and corporate members, and promote the advancement of the industry as a whole (the "purpose"). Emc will carry out its purpose through specific activities, conducted by its officers and directors, which include the following (1) hold forums and workshops for the improvement of the industry (60%); (2) host networking events (25%); (3) create and provide resources for its members (10%); and (4) assist non-working estate managers secure work (5%).
What it reported doing in 2025
Emc (1) held forums and workshops for the improvement of the industry; (2) hosted monthly networking events; (3) created an provided resources for its members; and (4) assisted non-working estate managers secure work with estate manager coalition relationships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 59.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.