Esplanade Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043550635
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6172270365
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,929,669
- Expenses
- $3,384,537
- Assets
- $23,278,130
- Liabilities
- $413,743
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER MERGEL (EXECUTIVE DI): $205,420 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To revitalize and enhance the charles river esplanade, preserve natural green space and build community by providing educational, cultural and recreational programs for everyone.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization works closely with the Massachusetts department of conservation and recreation, community organizations, businesses, corporations, foundations and individuals. Together, they plan, design and implement important maintenance, restoration, enhancement and programmatic projects and events for the benefit of the millions of individuals who visit the park each year. The organization's work focuses on: -projects designed to significantly improve the use, aesthetics and safety of the park, including maintenance and improvement of ballfields, pathways, and playgrounds, installation of new wayfinding signage, commissioning of public art, and the redevelopment of the lee pool site into a first-rate gathering, recreational and operational space. - programs that enrich the enjoyment of visitors to the park, connect people from diverse backgrounds and communities, and promote a strong sense of park ownership, including free fitness classes, concerts, children's activities, tours, volunteer events, cultural activities, and more. - advocacy for public policies and resource allocation that help protect and preserve the park for the benefit of diverse communities. Other programs: - ongoing maintenance of the park, specifically in the area of geese control, lawn maintenance, tree care and maintenance, shoreline vegetative management, rehabilitation of monuments and historic park elements, to promote a clean and cared for natural habitat; - producing or hosting donation based activities including a 5k race, boston marathon team, volunteer activites, and annual events: - collaboration on improving food and beverage offerings in the park and organizing free fitness classes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 86
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.7%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 65.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.88; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.7% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $205K · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.