Esperanza United

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411414710
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Saint Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6516465553
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,424,729
Expenses
$13,944,126
Assets
$11,054,826
Liabilities
$2,265,306

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICIA TOTOTZINTLE (FORMER CEO)
  • VIVIAN HUELGO (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PATRICIA TOTOTZINTLE (FORMER CEO): $263,093 total reported compensation
  • VIVIAN HUELGO (CEO): $191,582 total reported compensation
  • ANNIKA GIFFORD (CHIEF STRATEGY & IMPACT OFFICER): $183,697 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Esperanza united's mission is to mobilize latinas and latino communities to end domestic violence.

What it reported doing in 2024

The family advocacy team provides direct support for latin@s and their families, in the seven-county metropolitan area of the twin cities, Minnesota, who are experiencing domestic violence, dating violence, stalking and sexual assault. Esperanza united provides a variety of options to best meet our families' needs including: el refugio (emergency shelter), a bilingual crisis line, transitional housing support, assisting with referrals to other resources and mobile advocacy. Through mobile advocacy, our latin@ family advocates meet survivors wherever they feel safe, to help them create safety plans, navigate legal systems, and accompany them to school, court, or medical appointments. During this last year, our crisis line received over 600 calls related to domestic violence. El refugio provided safe housing for 247 survivors and their children, 220 individuals received emergency and financial assistance, 2007 instances of interpreter services were delivered, and 654 instances of transportation services were provided. Our family advocacy team also served 278 youth. We also continue to deepen our advocacy for survivors and provided 563 cases of legal advocacy which included 137 orders for protection. We have strengthened our outreach with community centered events such as the feria latina expo, where over 40 vendors plus a covid-19 and flu vaccine clinic showcased resources and support for survivors and their families, and hosted our third annual dia de los muertos event, where we honored and remembered the lives lost due to violence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.1%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $57.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.1% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $11.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $263K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $409K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 37 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 30 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.