Erik Proffitt Memorial Soccer Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
753094223
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3167340057
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,873
Expenses
$21,886
Assets
$89,337
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAN SHUMAKER (PRESIDENT)
  • DANNY GIROUX (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN ARKIN (TREASURER)
  • JAN SHUMAKER (PRESIDENT)
  • DANNY GIROUX (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educational organization

What it reported doing in 2025

The erik proffitt #19 memorial soccer fund (the "fund") was established to raise money in support of the erik proffitt #19 soccer complex and to honor the memory of a young man widely recognized as one of the best soccer players in the history of usd 259 high school soccer. In addition to supporting the soccer complex at northwest high school, the fund also recognizes annually, players from the northwest soccer teams by awarding scholarships for post-secondary education based on academic achievement and community service. Recipients are announced in april and introduced at the annual golf tournament.each year, the fund has a golf tournament to raise money in support of making improvements to erik's complex and the scholarship program. Proceeds from the program have paid for a concession stand/restroom, field lighting, scoreboards, led display board, public address system, sprinkler system, fencing, covered player benches and much more. To date over $325,000 of improvements have been made without the use of taxpayer money.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 37.2%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.08; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 37.2% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.