Eric Fuller Evangelistic Associatio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331193304
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Woodstock, GA, USA
- Phone
- 8175287887
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $106,602
- Expenses
- $125,954
- Assets
- $2,748
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIC A FULLER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ERIC A FULLER (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Eric fuller ministries exists to deliver the message of jesus christ to as many people as possible throughout the world and to encourage them to be actively involved in authentic personal growth in the lord. We continually strive to accomplish our mission through events that passionately share christ. Some of these events include: 1) connection week; 2) discovering potential weekend; 3) good news week; 4) equipping believers.
What it reported doing in 2015
Good news week - mission trips to preach christianity
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 59.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.