Eradicate Hate Global Summit

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922221894
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4128490539
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,857,004
Expenses
$3,100,985
Assets
$1,509,846
Liabilities
$41,884

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRETTE STEELE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRETTE STEELE (PRESIDENT): $279,734 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The global summit is forging solutions to prevent all forms of hate-fueled violence.

What it reported doing in 2025

The prevention practitioners network (ppn) is a national network of over 2,100 interdisciplinary professionals dedicated to using public health approaches to prevent targeted violence, terrorism, and their harmful impacts within the united states. Ppn conducts capacity-building workshops; publishes free practice guides; hosts a national directory of providers and recources; facilitates case consultations for clinicians; shares the latest research; and raises public awareness. Reach out resource hub provides national, centralized database of resources and organizations that can support those impacted by hate-fueled violence or those potentially at-risk of carrying out an attack. Whether you are a friend, teacher, concerned parents, or a victim or survivor of an attack, the resource hub points you to helpful resources in your area. Available resources include nonprofit organizations, state and local agencies, licensed mental health providers, social workers, educators, law enforcement officers and intervention teams, academics, and anyone else working in the community or providing relevant services. Eradicate hate's professional staff are global thought leaders in the prevention of hate-fueled violence. They regularly speak at national and internaional gatherings, submit oped articles and letters to the editor, partner with other organizations on projects, and comment on its work and other developments in the field through social media. One of its most recent projects is to develop an international directory of organizations working to prevent hate-fueld violence for display intially at the former nazi commandant's house at auschwitz, now a museum. The directory will enable those inspired by their visit to auschwitz to participate in prevention activities in their communities. Additional details and the eradicate hate global summit impact report can be found at www.eradicatehatesummit.org.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.3%; rating input score 57
  • Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 59.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.3% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $280K · 14 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $637K reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.