Equipping Leader Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 830550804
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Brea, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7142967331
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies & Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,400
- Expenses
- $28,097
- Assets
- $66,504
- Liabilities
- $666
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STANLEY L LEACH (PRESIDENT & CEO)
People named in this filing
- STANLEY L LEACH (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- GREGG PRICKETT (SECRETARY)
- ROB TINGLEY (TREASUR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Equipping leader ministries believes the local church is the single most powerful entity on earth. We exist to help local churches become equipping "hubs," where every pastor is an equipper, and every believer is a disciple-maker, preparing people to reach out into the culture in a transformative way.
What it reported doing in 2025
Take churches through a process including: assess, design, implement, multiply, and anchor change in a transformative process. Includes: meeting with church staffs and leaders, coaching leaders individually, producing/writing materials, raising funds, and recruiting new leaders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.37; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -15.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.