Equip Mozambique

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465226278
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Rolla, MO, USA
Phone
+1-314-551-9912
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$244,568
Expenses
$239,001
Assets
$60,047
Liabilities
$6,309

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jon Reinagel (Executive Director)
  • Carla Reinagel (Secretary/Asst. Executive DIrector)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jon Reinagel (Executive Director): $71,500 total reported compensation
  • Eugenio Makuyana (National Director - Mozambique): $14,000 total reported compensation
  • Carla Reinagel (Secretary/Asst. Executive DIrector): $12,720 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empoderando Moçambique exists to empower Mozambicans through education, technology, and community development, breaking the cycle of poverty and sharing the hope of Christ.

What it reported doing in 2024

It's been an exciting year for the sewing school! Last year we successfully raised funds for a new building to house the school, and in March we were able to move in! The extra space made it possible to add 7 new ladies to the beginner class who are now also receiving our holistic training that aims to transform every aspect of their lives. In February we launched a new initiative among our alumni network to have them regularly meet in small cell groups, and that has been an excellent way to provide continuity and further training. We are encouraging the cell leaders to turn their groups into daughter schools to make it possible for them to multiply the transformation that they have received. These leaders were also trained in how to teach our micro-entrepreneurship course to their groups, making it more likely that everyone's sewing businesses can thrive. We were invited to start offering sewing lessons in the local jail as well, which has been such a blessing! The women there are very grateful to learn a skill that can help them start their lives over when they get out. We have started them out with small projects that can be hand-sewn, and it is beautiful to watch the healing happen in their hearts as they create beautiful things and realize their potential. We graduated our tenth cohort of students in August, and each graduate left with more than just a machine and sewing skills - she now carries renewed dignity as she becomes an agent of change in her family and community, breaking cycles of poverty and creating a new legacy of hope.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 62
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.7%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $74.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 62.5%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.7% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 8 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $204K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.