Equine Cushings and Insulin Resistance Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453859561
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Tempe, AZ, USA
Phone
6033237469
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,639
Expenses
$41,539
Assets
$447,346
Liabilities
$43

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NANCY C COLLINS (President)
  • KATHLEEN GUSTAFSON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • CINDY MCGINLEY (Director)
  • NANCY C COLLINS (President)
  • JANNALEE SMITHEY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The character of affairs of the corporation will be: raise money to fund scientific research on equine metabolic disorders and advance the knowledge of horse owners, equine caregivers, and professionals relating to such diseases by disseminating the findings of that research and other related studies through public discussion groups, forums, lectures, and other similar programs, and by distributing printed media. This will be done with the goal of improving the welfare of equines affected by metabolic disorders. Please refer back to part iii of the main form 990-ez to see the total dollars spent on research and education given.

What it reported doing in 2025

The corporation's purpose is educational and scientific within the meaning of section 501(c)3 of the us internal revenue code. See schedule o for mission statement.mission/program expenses of $28,747 allocated by worksheet as if form 990 elected on page 10, part ix, statement of functional expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.3%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.77; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.3% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.