EquallyAble Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383604741
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chantilly, VA, USA
- Phone
- 571354 0244
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $344,630
- Expenses
- $327,595
- Assets
- $2,259,121
- Liabilities
- $5,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mohammed Yousuf (President)
- Sadat Mohammed (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mohammed Yousuf (President)
- Sadat Mohammed (Vice President)
- Jahir Hussain (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empower people with disabilities to learn, belong, and thrive through innovation, advocacy, and relentless action. With EquallyAble’s support, Kawaru set up a digital agency to help her community access essential government services. Despite her mobility challenges, a motorbike provided by EquallyAble now allows her to serve others in need. Kawaru’s impact is profound – she helps illiterate villagers with tasks like applying for ration cards and pensions. The community that once discouraged her education now relies on her. Join our mission. That’s exactly what our GiveIndependence1000 Initiative is all about. We’re on a mission to provide 1,000 life-changing assistive devices – wheelchairs, prosthetics, hearing aids, and more – to those who need them most. These aren’t just tools; they’re keys to unlock independence, dignity, and possibility. Imagine the joy of a child taking their...
What it reported doing in 2024
EquallyAbles equipment programs are designed to empower individuals with disabilities by helping them overcome barriers to education employment and active community participation
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.3%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.9; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 68.3% of revenue deployed · 71.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $233K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.