Equality State Policy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830305144
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Laramie, WY, USA
Phone
3072284163
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Citizen Participation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$274,868
Expenses
$378,080
Assets
$214,448
Liabilities
$5,723

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

People named in this filing

  • SHANNON ANDERSON (VICE CHAIR)
  • ERA ARANOW (SECRETARY)
  • CINDY BENNETT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

As a non-partisan coalition-based organization, the equality state policy center advances fair elections and transparent government in support of all Wyoming communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Espc works to ensure we all have a seat at the table in our representative democracy through empowering Wyoming citizens with information, tools, and skills that better enable their participation in wyomings government, ensuring representation, honesty, and respect for the rights and freedoms of all equality state communities. A fundamental element of espc's work is to ensure citizen participation through vote wy by informing voters of important election dates, the value of their vote, and current voter and elections related laws in Wyoming. Espc also assesses proposed alterations to elections related policies and offers expert guidance to decision makers, focusing on how these policies could affect wyomingites from citizen voters to those who help run secure, free, and honest state elections. Espc provides vote Wyoming educational materials in both spanish and english. The chair project targets civic engagement and voter education among underrepresented, particularly hispanic and latino in 2024, communities in Wyoming through community events like capital collaboration day, Wyoming in action, and viva la igualdad. Espc encourages underrepresented wyomingites to participate at all levels of government, from voting in elections to conversing with lawmakers and government officiala. Espc hosts trainings such as shape wy and run wy, along with educational webinars on issues important to wyomingites through peoples review live and co-hosting programs like tax facts lunch and learn. In addition, espc compiles research and works to safeguard policies that foster trust, accountability, fair process and participation in wyomings government. Our representative democracy works best when it is inclusive of the diversity of its citizenry and strives to be responsive and accountable to those it seeks to govern equitably.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $157.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $364K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.