Epsilon Omicron Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega Fraternity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237107695
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Phone
3175795050
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Student Sororities, Fraternities

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,343
Expenses
$59,203
Assets
$83,550
Liabilities
$51,655

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE WEITZEL 1123 TO 1224 (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE WEITZEL 1123 TO 1224 (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • ELLIANA FRAZEE 1123 TO 1224 (VP CHAPTER RELATIONS AND STANDARDS)
  • MADISON MANSFIELD 0425 TO 1225 (VP DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alpha chi omega shapes the future through the powerful, transformative and everlasting connections of real, strong women.

What it reported doing in 2024

Local collegiate chapter of alpha chi omega fraternity, inc. Through our real. Strong. Women. Experience, our members seek to become the best version of themselves. Through alpha chi omega programs and the community built within each chapter, members discover what our values of wisdom, devotion and achievement mean to them and how they can have an impact on our fraternity and our world.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.