Episcopal Health Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462599162
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Houston, TX, United States
- Phone
- 713.225.0900
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,717,449
- Expenses
- $57,398,786
- Assets
- $1,224,869,133
- Liabilities
- $12,999,941
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ann Barnes (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Rt Rev C Andrew Doyle (Chair): $766,504 total reported compensation
- Ann Barnes (President & CEO): $691,118 total reported compensation
- Linda Riley Mitchell (Treasurer & CFO): $511,512 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Episcopal Health Foundation (EHF) believes ALL Texans deserve to live a healthy life—especially those with the least resources and those who face the most obstacles to health—and is dedicated to improving health, not just health care in Texas. Simone Flowers is the Executive Director of Interfaith Action of Central Texas (iACT), whose mission is to cultivate peace and respect through interfaith dialogue, service and celebration. Simone has over 28 years of extensive experience in non-profit management. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and a Master of Business Administration from St. Edward’s University. Simone is a member of the Austin Area Research Organization, Town Lake Chapter of the Links Incorporated and Impact Austin. She currently serves on the Board of Directors for; Community Advancement Network, Austin Housing Repair Coalition, One Voice Central Texas, St....
What it reported doing in 2024
Episcopal Health Foundation works to improve the health of the 15 million people in the 81 counties of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas in furtherance of our mission and charter by making grants to qualified non-profit organizations and governmental entities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some related-organization disclosures are missing and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.3%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.34; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $49.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $767K · 22 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 164 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 158 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.