Episcopal Group Homes
Legal name: Episcopal Group Homes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411308707
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Wayzata, MN, United States
- Phone
- 952-475-1621
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,536,805
- Expenses
- $2,231,628
- Assets
- $4,951,171
- Liabilities
- $100,441
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORI JASPER (PRESIDENT)
- SUE RUDICK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY WENDT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JEREMY WENDT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $112,354 total reported compensation
- SANDRA ESTERS (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $79,963 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The EGH community supports individuals with disabilities in leading meaningful lives that honor their values, aspirations, and choices Our Values. We at EGH value community, dignity, choice, relationships, and commitment. These values guide us through every aspect of supporting the people we serve and providing high quality employment. Our Mission. Those who make financial gifts to EGH’s mission are a valued part of the community Dignity Each individual is unique and deserves support made just for them.
What it reported doing in 2025
Episcopal group homes offers a range of support services through integrated community supports (ics), individualized home supports with training (ihswt), and community residential services (crs) available to individuals with disabilities. Our ics fourplex apartment setting allows individuals to live as independently as possible while still having access to staff support as needed. This wayzata setting fosters a sense of community while respecting personal privacy and autonomy. Our ihswt services are tailored to each person's unique goals and needs. This includes assistance with daily living skills, health and wellness routines, financial management, and community engagement, all with a focus on skill-building and independence. Our three sls homes in plymouth provide 24-hour care by trained direct support professionals. Our services include guidance in areas such as social skills, home maintenance, cooking, transportation, money management, communication and coping skills. These services ensure safety and stability while encouraging personal growth and self-determination. At episcopal group homes, our teams are person-centered, empowering individuals to lead lives of their design while receiving the appropriate level of support to thrive. Revenue comes through medicaid and social security which is funded in part by the federal, state and county government.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.22; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.