Episcopal Foundation Of Dallas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 756038552
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2143669996
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $681,981
- Expenses
- $423,976
- Assets
- $44,263,219
- Liabilities
- $37,036,607
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pamela Fellows Jamieson (Executive Director)
- Robbi Rice Dietrich (President)
- Kenneth Hanks (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Pamela Fellows Jamieson (Executive Director): $88,200 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
What it reported doing in 2020
Investment services: the foundation manages long-term assets of the episcopal diocese of dallas (edod), as well as episcopal churches, schools, missions, and agencies within the geographic boundaries of edod.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.8%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 59.6%; rating input score 60
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 64.1%; rating input score 64; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 104.4; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.8% of revenue deployed · 59.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $252K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.