Envision Eyecare for All
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923003032
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-PF 2023, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Hood River, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5416458400
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $318,770
- Expenses
- $166,259
- Assets
- $228,235
- Liabilities
- $592
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GINGER MOONEY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GINGER MOONEY (PRESIDENT)
- KAREN SMITH (TREASURER)
- STACEY CAMPBELL (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission at envision eye care for all is to provide equitable access to primary eye health and vision services in underserved populations throughout rural Oregon. We acknowledge the systemic inequities that hinder individuals from accessing essential eye care. We recognize the profound impact of uncorrected vision problems on academic success, employment opportunities, independence, and daily well-being. Our mobile clinic delivers culturally competent and compassionate care in an inclusive environment that respects the values and diversity of all patients and promotes visual excellence and the preservation of eye health. Envision eye care for all is committed to empowering individuals to thrive by ensuring they have the vision care they need to reach their full potential.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, the organization delivered 30 mobile vision clinics across 3 counties in rural Oregon, providing 210 comprehensive eye examinations and 189 pairs of prescription glasses to predominantly publicly insured and uninsured patients. Services included spanish-language and interpreted care. Outreach efforts reached 440 additional individuals, generated 357 community surveys to inform programming, and resulted in referrals for follow-up care. The organization also invested in workforce certification, trained volunteers, and contributed significant donated clinical and administrative hours.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 76% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.4%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 98.5%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 71.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 100.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.4% of revenue deployed · 98.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $164K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.