Envision Creative Support for Peo- Ple with Developmental Disabilities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840568176
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Evans, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9703132608
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,755,779
- Expenses
- $8,780,105
- Assets
- $4,878,591
- Liabilities
- $1,317,595
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLISON KANZLER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CELESTE EWERT (EXECUTIVE DI): $112,435 total reported compensation
- RUTHMARY LYONS (FINANCE & AD): $79,124 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Envision, creative support for people with developmental disabilities' mission is to enhance the quality of life for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in weld county.
What it reported doing in 2024
Early intervention is for children from birth through age two which offer infants and toddlers and their families services and supports to enhance child development in the areas of cognition, speech, communication, physical, motor, vision, hearing, social-emotional development, and self help skills; parent-child or family interaction; and early identification, screening and assessment services. Expenses: 2,763,507 revenue:3,420,611 family support provides an array of supportive services to the person with a developmental disability and his/her family when the person remains within the family home, thereby preventing or delaying the need for out- of-home placement, which is unwanted by the person or the family. Expenses: 49,852, revenue: 24,392 case management is the determination of eligibility for services and supports, service and support coordination, and the monitoring of all services and supports delivered pursuant to the ip, and the evaluation of results identified in the ip. Expenses: 1,649,248 revenue: 1,012,661
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $8.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $112K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $714K reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.