Enveritas
Legal name: Enveritas Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811681880
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2033440055
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,611,477
- Expenses
- $21,389,824
- Assets
- $49,426,259
- Liabilities
- $3,810,745
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID BROWNING (PRESIDENT, TREASURER & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID BROWNING (PRESIDENT, TREASURER & CEO): $470,515 total reported compensation
- JEFF POTTER (CTO): $313,556 total reported compensation
- ALEXANDER VIDOR (SOFTWARE ENGINEER): $193,632 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Enveritas works with smallholder farmers to solve rural poverty and protect ecosystems.
What it reported doing in 2024
Enveritas inc. Provides sustainability verification services to coffee and cocoa producing communities around the world. The organization conducts independent field assessments to evaluate the environmental, social, and economic conditions of smallholder coffee farms. Using technology such as satellite imagery and mobile data collection, enveritas measures issues including deforestation, child labor, pesticide use, and sustainable production, without charging farmers for participation.the data gathered are analyzed to identify systemic challenges in the coffee and cocoa sector and to help companies, donors, and partners implement more effective poverty-reduction and sustainability programs. Enveritas collaborates with international coffee roasters, cooperatives, and local organizations to strengthen sustainable sourcing practices and improve farmer livelihoods. In 2024, enveritas operated in more than 30 coffee-producing countries and completed over 90,000 farm verifications. As part of the responsibly sourced commitment, roaster partners are required by enveritas to support farmers directly. This translated to 276,000 farmers supported in 22 countries, across 123 projects. Projects provided support to farming households, school-aged children, and farm workers. These projects worked to increase adoption of good agricultural practices on farms, safer use of chemicals and improved working conditions, higher adherence to minimum wage standards, and prevention of child labor in coffee communities, among others.beyond this, and in keeping with enveritas' mission is to relieve poverty and promote sustainable farming practices, enveritas directly designs, tests, implements and funds interventions that equip farmers with knowledge, services, and solutions to increase productivity, resilience, and environmental sustainability. Throughout the year 2024, enveritas directly supported more than 40,000 farmers across east africa and south east asia. This included technical assistance in pest and disease management in uganda, the development of a rejuvenation and organic fertilization program for farmers in ethiopia, and the development of a soil testing program in vietnam to improve soil health and reduce carbon emissions. To protect the livelihoods of coffee farmers and sustain exports from vulnerable regions, enveritas has also developed a deforestation detection system that enables global coffee supply chains to prepare for and comply with eudr legislation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $101.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.1%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.31; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 38.6% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $471K · 10 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.